Verified fact
A fact supported by a current primary or project source. Confirm it still applies to the exact component and unit.
Project comparison
Select three projects and compare verified facts, intended buyer fit and the questions that still need documentary answers.
| Decision factor | Likas BayThe V by Jesselton | Kepayan88 Avenue | LikasLikas Pavilion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Likas Bay | Kepayan | Likas |
| Development type | Integrated waterfront | Mixed development | Commercial |
| Developer | Jesselton International / Jesselton Waterfront Sdn Bhd | Mega City Avenue Sdn Bhd | Titijaya Land Berhad |
| Scale | Approximately 10 acres | Not published until verified | 27 en-bloc units |
| Components | Serviced suites · retail · corporate offices | Residential · serviced suites · retail | Five-storey retail offices |
| Who it may suit | Buyers comparing waterfront lifestyle, business-use and investment formats. | Own-stay and investment buyers who prioritise Kepayan convenience. | Established businesses, headquarters and commercial investors assessing whole-building control. |
| Trade-off to verify | Commercial-title, operating rules, final packages and current availability should be checked unit by unit. | Different towers and title/use formats require separate analysis; do not compare headline pricing without checking the component. | Final layouts, specifications, pricing and launch details remain subject to confirmation. |
Blank fields are a feature, not an error. The platform will not manufacture price, tenure, maintenance, density, short-stay or completion facts merely to make a table look complete.
Read the table correctly
A useful comparison distinguishes verified facts, current commercial terms and personal assumptions.
A fact supported by a current primary or project source. Confirm it still applies to the exact component and unit.
Price, availability, package and financing can change. Request a dated written version before relying on it.
Rent, vacancy, holding period and resale timing belong in a stress test—not in a guaranteed-return statement.
The best project is the one that fits the use case, cash plan and time horizon after the trade-offs are visible.
Before you choose
Unit and component being compared
All-in cash and monthly holding cost
Layout, orientation, parking and actual view
Title, approved use and management rules
Target tenant or future resale buyer
Downside case if rent or resale takes longer